Mezofauna tla: Indeksi biodiverziteta i metodologija istraživanja
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54652/rsf.2026.v56.i1.644Ključne riječi:
soil mesofauna, biodiversity, bioindicators, soil quality, pedoecologySažetak
This review paper examines the role of soil mesofauna in maintaining the biological balance and functionality of edaphic ecosystems, with a particular focus on its application as a bioindicator of soil quality in the Balkan region. The aim of the study is to consolidate existing knowledge on the composition of mesofauna, its ecological role, research methodology, and the application of various biodiversity indices in assessing soil status. The analysis is based on a synthesis of relevant scientific literature in the fields of pedoecology and soil biology, including both original and review studies related to forest, agricultural, and urban soils. The results of the review indicate that mesofauna, particularly mites (Acari) and springtails (Collembola), plays a key role in the decomposition of organic matter, stimulation of microbial activity, and nutrient cycling. Furthermore, the high sensitivity of mesofauna to environmental changes has been confirmed, making it a reliable indicator of degradation, pollution, and intensive land use. Analyzed biodiversity indices, including the Soil Biocenosis Quality Index, the Arthropod-Based Soil Biological Quality Index, as well as the Shannon–Wiener, Simpson, and Berger–Parker indices, have proven to be effective tools for assessing the ecological status of soils. It is concluded that the combined application of functional and structural indices, alongside standardized sampling and analytical methodologies, allows for a reliable assessment of soil biological quality and contributes to the development of sustainable land management in the region.
Downloads
References
Bardgett, R. D., & van der Putten, W. H. (2014). Belowground biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Oxford University Press.
Hopkin, S. P. (2007). A key to the Collembola (springtails) of Britain and Ireland. Field Studies Council.
Krantz, G. W., & Walter, D. E. (2009). A manual of acarology (3rd ed.). Texas Tech University Press.
Lavelle, P., Decaëns, T., Aubert, M., Barot, S., Blouin, M., Bureau, F., Margerie, P., Mora, P., & Rossi, J. P. (2006). Soil invertebrates and ecosystem services. European Journal of Soil Biology, 42(S1), S3–S15. Elsevier.
Magurran, A. E. (2004). Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Publishing.
Parisi, V., Menta, C., Gardi, C., Jacomini, C., & Mozzanica, E. (2005). Microarthropod communities as a tool to assess soil quality and biodiversity: A new approach in Italy. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 105(1–2), 323–333. Elsevier.
Rusek, J. (1998). Biodiversity of Collembola and their functional role in the ecosystem. Biodiversity and Conservation, 7(9), 1207–1219. Springer.
Internet izvori
Ilić, B., Petrović, J., & Stanković, S. (2018). Soil mesofauna as indicators of soil quality in forest and agricultural ecosystems of the Balkans. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 19(2), 455–463. Preuzeto sa https://www.scibulcom.net
Marković, M., Jovanović, D., & Nikolić, A. (2021). Application of biodiversity indices in assessment of soil ecological status in urban and forest ecosystems. Archives of Biological Sciences, 73(4), 589–601. Preuzeto sa https://www.serbiosoc.org.rs
Downloads
Objavljeno
How to Cite
Broj časopisa
Rubrika
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ena Nezirović, Elvira Hadžiahmetović Jurida

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
