Utjecaj propisanog načina premjera na greške obračunate zapremine oblog drveta smrče (Picea abies (L.) Karsten) i jele (Abies alba Mill.)

Jusuf Musić; Jelena Knežević; Velid Halilović; Besim Balić; Admir Avdagić; Amina Karišik; Ehlimana Pamić

doi:10.54652/rsf.2025.v55.i2.617

Authors

Jusuf Musić University of Sarajevo Faculty of Forestry, Zagrebačka 20, 71000 Sarajevo Bosnia and Herzegovina https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2408-3077
Jelena Knežević University of Sarajevo Faculty of Forestry, Zagrebačka 20, 71000 Sarajevo Bosnia and Herzegovina https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5548-512X
Velid Halilović University of Sarajevo Faculty of Forestry, Zagrebačka 20, 71000 Sarajevo Bosnia and Herzegovina https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4007-121X
Besim Balić University of Sarajevo Faculty of Forestry, Zagrebačka 20, 71000 Sarajevo Bosnia and Herzegovina
Admir Avdagić University of Sarajevo Faculty of Forestry, Zagrebačka 20, 71000 Sarajevo Bosnia and Herzegovina https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5866-6946
Amina Karišik University of Sarajevo Faculty of Forestry, Zagrebačka 20, 71000 Sarajevo Bosnia and Herzegovina https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3197-3055
Ehlimana Pamić University of Sarajevo Faculty of Forestry, Zagrebačka 20, 71000 Sarajevo Bosnia and Herzegovina https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0803-9130

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54652/rsf.2025.v55.i2.617

Abstract

The study examined the sources of volume loss in spruce and fir roundwood resulting from the prescribed Huber’s formula, the prescribed method of diameter measurement, the prescribed method of length measurement, and the deduction of double bark thickness. The Riecke’s formula was assumed to provide the most accurate determination of log volume and was therefore used to calculate the gross volume of roundwood, serving as the reference value for quantifying the observed losses. For all analyzed sources of volume loss except when applying Huber’s formula, a dependence on diameter class was observed, with losses decreasing as diameter increased. The highest percentage of volume loss for both spruce and fir logs was found when deducting double bark thickness (ranging from 9.1% to 6.4% for spruce and from 10.7% to 7.7% for fir), followed by the prescribed method of diameter measurement (from 7.3% to 1.7%). Additional losses were associated with the prescribed volume calculation formula (from 5.3% to 1.5% for spruce and from 3.7% to 1.1% for fir) and the prescribed method of length measurement (from 3.1% to 2.1%).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Altherr, E. (1960). Die Genauigkeit verschiedener Verfahren der Sektionierung in absoluten und relativen Schaftlägen. AFJZ, 226–237.

Banković, S., & Pantić, D. (2006). Dendrometrija. Šumarski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.

EN 1309-2. (2006). Round and sawn timber – Method of measurement of dimensions – Part 2: Round timber – Requirements for measurement and volume calculation rules.

Dvořák, J., Löwe, R., Natov, P., Jankovský, M., & Sedmíková, M. (2020). Unrecorded volume of Norway spruce timber in cut-to-length harvesting. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 35(7), 383–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2020.1815829

Đuka, A., Sertić, M., Pentek, T., Papa, I., Janeš, D., & Poršinsky, T. (2020). Round wood waste and losses – Is rationalisation in scaling possible? Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering, 41(2), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.5552/crojfe.2020.770

Fonseca, M. A. (2005). The measurement of roundwood: Methodologies and conversion ratios. CABI Publishing.

Gurda, A. (2025). Utjecaj propisanog načina premjera i obračuna zapremine na privlačenje tehničkog oblog drveta (Završni rad). Univerzitet u Sarajevu – Šumarski fakultet.

Janák, K. (2007). Differences in round wood measurements using electronic 2D and 3D systems and standard manual method. Drvna industrija, 58(3), 127–133. https://hrcak.srce.hr/17494

Jugoslovenski standard sa obaveznom primenom – JUS D.BO.022. (1984). Razvrstavanje i merenje neobrađenog i obrađenog drveta. Službeni list SFRJ, br. 62/84.

Lojo, A., Musić, J., Balić, B., Avdagić, A., Halilović, V., Ibrahimspahić, A., & Knežević, J. (2019). Debljina i udio kore u zapremini oblog drveta jele (Abies alba Mill.). Naše šume, 54–55, 5–18.

Krpan, A. P. B. (1986). Bark of the beech from the standpoint of forest exploitation. In Miscellanea of Colloquy about the Beech – The Conference of the Assistants Section (pp. 77–88). Forestry Faculty of University Zagreb.

Lipoglavšek, M. (1996). Kakovost gozdnih lesnih proizvodov. Zbornik gozdarstva in lesarstva, 51, 59–65.

Mihajlov, I. (1983). Obujam. In Šumarska enciklopedija (Vol. 2, pp. 527–540). JLZ „Miroslav Krleža“.

Miklašēvičs, Z. (2013). Harmonization of piece-by-piece measurement methods of roundwood approved by Latvian standards LVS 82:2003 “Apaļo kokmateriālu uzmērišana”. In Environment. Technology. Resources: Proceedings of the 9th International Scientific and Practical Conference (pp. 154–162). https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2013vol1.818

Musić, J., Lojo, A., Balić, B., Ibrahimspahić, A., Avdagić, A., Knežević, J., & Halilović, V. (2019). Modelling bark thickness of Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.). South-East European Forestry (SEEFOR), 10(2), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.15177/seefor.19-17

Patterson, D. W., Wiant, H. V. Jr., & Wood, G. B. Jr. (1993). Comparison of the centroid method and taper systems for estimating tree volumes. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry, 10(1), 8–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/njaf/10.1.8

Pavlič, J. (1973). Istraživanje zavisnosti procentualnog učešća sortimenata smrče od debljine, visina i kvaliteta stabla. Radovi Šumarskog fakulteta i Instituta za šumarstvo u Sarajevu, 17(1–3), 1–69. https://doi.org/10.54652/rsf.1972.v20.i1-3.467

Poršinsky, T., & Vujeva, J. (2007). Gubici obujma izrađene smrekove oblovine zbog propisanoga načina izmjere. Nova mehanizacija šumarstva, 28, 37–47. https://hrcak.srce.hr/21172

Poršinsky, T., Đuka, A., & Busić, O. (2014). Utjecaj propisnosti mjerenja oblovine na transport drva. Nova mehanizacija šumarstva, 35, 1–9. https://hrcak.srce.hr/121850

Prolić, N. (1975). Sortimentne tablice na bazi ukupne drvne mase i krupnog drveta – jela. In Tablice taksacionih elemenata visokih i izdanačkih šuma u SR Bosni i Hercegovini (pp. 152–159). Šumarski fakultet Univerziteta u Sarajevu. https://doi.org/10.54652/rsf.1980.v1.i13.271

Rebula, E. (1983). Mjerenje sortimenata u uvjetima dorade na centralnim mehaniziranim skladištima. Šumarski list, 107(3–4), 225–232.

Rebula, E. (1994). Nesigurnost određivanja obujma oblovine četinjača te prijedlog novoga mjernog postupka. Mehanizacija šumarstva, 19(2), 87–110.

Schopfer, W. (1982). Rundholzvermessung in Wandel – Entwicklungstendenzen bei der Vermessung von Massensortimenten. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt, 121–131.

Turk, Z., & Lipoglavšek, M. (1972). Volumni in težinski delež lubja glede na premer deblovine jelke, smreke in bukve na nekaterih območjih Slovenije. Inštitut za gozdno in lesno gospodarstvo, Ljubljana.

Vukmirović, V. (1971). Istraživanje učešća sortimenata bukve u čistim i mješovitim bukovim sastojinama u Bosni – sortimentne tablice. Radovi Šumarskog fakulteta i Instituta za šumarstvo u Sarajevu, 14(4–6), 33–66. https://doi.org/10.54652/rsf.1969.v17.i4-6